Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): switch to upstream action and update workflows #1034

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

noelmiller
Copy link
Member

@noelmiller noelmiller commented Mar 19, 2024

BLOCKERS:

  • Change @main to @version_number when action is published
  • All images need to successfully build
  • BEFORE MERGING, readd surface images to build.
  • THIS NEEDS TO MERGE BEFORE MERGING: fix: remove old yafti #1051 (review)

@noelmiller noelmiller changed the title chore(ci): switch to upstream action and combine workflows chore(ci): switch to upstream action and update workflows Mar 20, 2024
@abanna
Copy link

abanna commented Mar 27, 2024

not required but useful

RUN <<EOF
echo "Hello" >> /hello
echo "World!" >> /hello
EOF

@noelmiller noelmiller marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2024 15:55
@noelmiller noelmiller requested a review from castrojo as a code owner March 28, 2024 15:55
Copy link
Member

@p5 p5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only a nit, but otherwise LGTM

.github/workflows/build_iso.yml Show resolved Hide resolved

env:
IMAGE_REGISTRY: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository_owner }}
workflow_call:
Copy link
Member

@p5 p5 Mar 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO controlling stuff like whether to push to R2 or GHA, and the channel (stable / testing) should be controlled in the calling workflow and not the reusable workflow, but this is a nit

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be better, but we currently manually call build_iso.yml on it's own for uploading ISOs, so it needs to operate independently of the other workflow.

Copy link
Member

@KyleGospo KyleGospo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yo this is fire

@castrojo castrojo added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 28, 2024
@castrojo castrojo removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Mar 28, 2024
@castrojo castrojo added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 28, 2024
@castrojo castrojo removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Mar 28, 2024
@castrojo castrojo merged commit ce18074 into main Mar 28, 2024
64 checks passed
@castrojo castrojo deleted the testing branch March 28, 2024 18:46
awesomekyle pushed a commit to awesomekyle/bluefin that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants